TRIBUTE TO JOHN F. KENNEDY AT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION
Atlantic City, New Jersey August 27, 1964 Mr. Chairman--Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chairman, Mrs. Johnson, Senator Jackson, ladies and gentlemen, I wish to speak just for a few moments. I first want to thank all of you delegates to the Democratic National Convention and the supporters of the Democratic Party for all that you did for President John F. Kennedy. I want to express my appreciation to you for the efforts that you made on his behalf at the convention four years ago, the efforts that you made on his behalf for his election in November of 1960, and perhaps most importantly, the encouragement and the strength that you gave him after he was elected President of the United States. I know that it was a source of the greatest strength to him to know that there were thousands of people all over the United States who were together with him, dedicated to certain principles and to certain ideals. No matter what talent an individual possesses, what energy he might have, no matter how much integrity and how much honesty he might have, if he is by himself, and particularly a political figure, he can accomplish very little. But if he is sustained, as President Kennedy was, by the Democratic Party all over the United States, dedicated to the same things that he was attempting to accomplish, he can accomplish a great deal. No one knew that more than President John F. Kennedy. He used to take great pride in telling of the trip that Thomas Jefferson and James Madison made up the Hudson River in 1800 on a botanical expedition searching for butterflies; that they ended up down in New York City and that they formed the Democratic Party. He took great pride in the fact that the Democratic Party was the oldest political Party in the world, and he knew that this linkage of Madison and Jefferson with the leaders in New York combined the North and South, and combined the industrial areas of the country with the rural farms and that this combination was always dedicated to progress and all of our Presidents have been dedicated to progress. He thought of Thomas Jefferson in the Louisiana Purchase, and also when Jefferson realized that the United States could not remain on the Eastern Seaboard and sent Lewis and Clark to the West Coast; of Andrew Jackson; of Woodrow Wilson; of Franklin Roosevelt who saved our citizens who were in great despair because of the financial crisis; of Harry Truman who not only spoke but acted for freedom. So, when he became President he not only had his own principles and his own ideals but he had the strength of the Democratic Party. As President he wanted to do something for the mentally ill and the mentally retarded; for those who were not covered by Social Security; for those who were not receiving an adequate minimum wage; for those who did not have adequate housing; for our elderly people who had difficulty paying their medical bills; for our fellow citizens who are not white and who had difficulty living in this society. To this he dedicated himself. But he realized also that in order for us to make progress here at home, that we had to be strong overseas, that our military strength had to be strong. He said one time, "Only when our arms are sufficient, without doubt, can we be certain, without doubt, that they will never have to be employed." So when we had the crisis with the Soviet Union and the Communist Bloc in October of 1962, the Soviet Union withdrew their missiles and bombers from Cuba. Even beyond that, his idea really was that this country, that this world, should be a better place when we turned it over to the next generation than when we inherited it from the last generation. That is why--with all of the other efforts that he made--the Test Ban Treaty, which was done with Averell Harriman, was so important to him. And that's why he made such an effort and was committed to the young people not only of the United States but to the young people of the world. And in all of these efforts you were there all of you. When there were difficulties, you sustained him. When there were periods of crisis, you stood beside him. When there were periods of happiness, you laughed with him. And when there were periods of sorrow, you comforted him. I realize that as individuals we can't just look back, that we must look forward. When I think of President Kennedy, I think of what Shakespeare said in Romeo and Juliet: When he shall die Take him and cut him out into stars And he shall make the face of heaven so fine That all the world will be in love with night, And pay no worship to the garish sun. I realize that as individuals, and even more important, as a political party and as a country, we can't just look to the past, we must look to the future. So I join with you in realizing that what started four years ago--what everyone here started four years ago--that is to be sustained; that is to be continued. The same effort and the same energy and the same dedication that was given to President John F. Kennedy must be given to President Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey. If we make that evident, it will not only be for the benefit of the Democratic Party, but, far more important, it will be for the benefit of this whole country. When we look at this film we must think that President Kennedy once said: "We have the capacity to make this the best generation in the history of mankind, or make it the last." If we do our duty, if we meet our responsibilities and our obligations, not just as Democrats, but as American citizens in our local cities and towns and farms and our states and in the country as a whole, then this generation of Americans is going to be the best generation in the history of mankind. He often quoted from Robert Frost--and said it applied to himself--but we could apply it to the Democratic Party and to all of us as individuals: The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep. And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
Powered by
Comments
Democratic National Convention
its very informative post about the Democratic National Convention.table lamps The 1968 Democratic National Convention of the U.S. Democratic Party was held at the International Amphitheatre in Chicago, Illinois, from August 26 to August 29, 1968.lighting Because Democratic President Lyndon Johnson had announced he would not seek a second term, the purpose of the convention was to select a new nominee to run as the Democratic Party’s candidate for the office.floor lampsThe keynote speaker was Senator Daniel Inouye.
John F Kennedy
I can't wait to hear the reactions from news outlets, pakistani issues, and maybe some Kennedys(?), when this finally spreads later on today.
If we do our duty, if we
If we do our duty, if we meet our responsibilities and our obligations, not just as Democrats, but as American citizens in our local cities and towns and farms and our states and in the country as a whole, then this generation of Americans is going to be the best generation in the history of mankind. NS0-153 exam
He often quoted from Robert Frost--and said it applied to himself--but we could apply it to the Democratic Party and to all of us as individuals: 70-272 exam
Mrs. Kennedy has asked that this film be dedicated to all of you and to all the others throughout the country who helped make John F. Kennedy President of the United States. 000-223 exam
In 1960 he was prevented
In 1960 he was prevented from returning to South Africa after a concert abroad, following a statement critical of apartheid. Makeba, born in 1932 in Johannesburg, spent 31 years in exile. With his voice and talent impressed in London to Harry Belafonte, who then opened many doors in United States.
Seven years after beginning his exile, became world famous with "Pata, Pata". After her marriage to an activist of the protest movement "Black Panthers" in 1968, Makeba also had to leave United States. loan
She later lived in Guinea, which gave him a diplomatic passport. Makeba was able to return to his native country only in 1990 when the apartheid regime began to crumble
The Liberal Democratic Party
The Liberal Democratic Party is the heir to the political thinking of President José Manuel Balmaceda (1886-1891), a leader in the defense of the presidential system for the government of Chile. The creation and evolution of this party have not been studied adequately in historiography, both in terms of its ideas, organization, leadership and importance, as compared with other political forces in the period when it was vigente1. This article proposes, in this sense, identifying the central aspects of the Great Convention of 1893, is transcendental in the formation of the party, and thus contribute to the study of the Liberal Democratic Party, of which there is so far a work of joint comprehensive and specific. The mere realization of this convention and the fact of becoming a political party had the greatest systemic importance, considering that other supporters of Balmaceda in 1891 and defeated _los "termocéfalos" _ continued to promote the ways of rebellion and a potential new breakthrough civil2.
Since its inception, the Balmaceda, in all its nuances, it became politically isolated after the civil war in 1891, in the midst of defeat and helplessness. While liberals were the balmaceda, somehow, the pariahs of the political system and helped to defeat armed outlaw and humiliated. Appear long after, as many as a political doctrine or organization, without sound, purely opportunistic. Once reintegrated into life after the parliamentary elections of 1894, the Liberal democratic arrangements and sought alliances with other liberal groups to which they faced in 1891 but with whom he had previously shared ideas and political power, such as the Liberal Party and radicalism. That attitude, a mixture of opportunism and deepest convictions, was severely criticada3. Distrust towards balmaceda grew further when, years later, they joined forces with the Conservative Party to form government in times of Frederick E. Errázuriz Thus, they were labeled traitors to the legacy of Balmaceda, as simple poder4 seekers. Or in the words of Encina, the party "abandoned the program Balmaceda, to join the parliamentary saraband and not remember it again in the twenty-six years running up to 1920" 5.
However, the problem is more complex, and we have to look at the roots of the Liberal Democratic Party, that is the legacy of Balmaceda and the political agenda as it was first made at the Grand Convention Balmaceda, conducted in November 1893 . It was this social and political event that consolidated the restoration of the vanquished and defined the course of action for the following years. It also brought together most of the men who carried forward the restoration of the party, virtually destroyed two years earlier. This meeting is of great political importance for historical analysis. As summarized by July Heise, "during the last decades of the nineteenth century, the doctrinal content of the program are reviewed and determined by conventions composed of delegates appointed periodicals throughout the country. It ended up being the highest authority of the party" 6 .
At the Great Convention may be elements that remain present throughout the parliamentary regime in Chile, both in academic subjects such as political attitudes. In analyzing the Chilean political parties of the time should always be taken into account these two dimensions of the problem: which groups claim to be in its principles and purposes and what the parties are actually in their public actions. In this case, the Liberal Democratic Party was filed shortly after the civil war as the only defender of the movement-presidential representative system, against the existing parliamentary system in Chile after the civil war of 1891 and supported by all other parties . However, he also accepted the rules of the system, participating as loyal triumphant competitors within the regime of 18,917. mortgages
The insertion of the Party in the parliamentary system has not been well understood and has been harshly criticized, almost hard. This is due to inconsistency of policy to go against the principles of Balmaceda, who objected strongly to the parliamentary system. Sometimes, however, have not been largely internal documents and definitions of political party and its leaders, as well as the actual reasons that led beyond the political ambition or the desire for public office, to participate actively rejected by the system and its fundador8 them. Thus a historian who, despite defending the work of Balmaceda passionately declares: "The Liberal Democratic Party, which emerged in 1893 as a repository of ideas Balmaceda was only an opportunist Montoneros and despicable" 9.